Tenant Farmers Association (TFA)

43rd ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

Wednesday 05 March 2025

Report from the TFA National Chair, Robert Martin

It is hard to believe that I have reached the end of my first year in post as TFA National Chair, and what a year it has been. I came into the post with a Conservative Government in Westminster, who we were expecting to be in office until at least the autumn of 2024. However, just two months into my tenure as National Chair, on that rain-soaked day in May, we were very quickly plunged into General Election mode, as the then Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, calling a snap General Election. That decision by the then Prime Minister was a surprise to us all, including, by all accounts his own backbench MPs.

Practically speaking, it seemed like the whole of Government was placed on pause whilst we awaited the verdict of the electorate. Planned meetings with officials were speedily removed from calendars and public engagement on pre-existing policies came to a halt. This was particularly frustrating given that, in England, DEFRA had not long since announced the launch of the Sustainable Farming Incentive extended offer which, whilst still available to join, lacked any of the usual engagement both DEFRA and RPA would have conducted to help farmers and their advisers navigate their way through the scheme. Indeed, even a TFA webinar with senior DEFRA officials had to be pulled from the schedule at very short notice. This inevitably led to huge frustration within the farming community.

The announcement of the General Election also came within 10 days of Rishi Sunak holding his Farm to Fork summit in Downing Street which I was fortunate to attend and where there was no hint of his imminent plan to go to the country. At the summit the Prime Minister made a raft of announcements including, importantly for the TFA, the confirmation that the Government would appoint a Tenant Farming Commissioner for England following the recommendation made within the Rock Review. A timetable for appointment was set as being completed in the autumn of last year. Another, very important announcement made at that time was about the extension of the Farm Recovery Fund payments to assist those farmers who had been massively impacted by the flooding experienced the previous autumn and winter. Both those announcements, and a host of other commitments, were assigned to the waiting room for the incoming Government to pick up after the election.

Going into the election period, no one was expecting anything other than a Labour victory. What was in doubt would be the size of that victory. Very quickly, we began to dust down the statements made and commitments given by senior Labour figures, including Sir Keir Stamer, whilst in opposition. This included fulsome endorsement of the recommendations of the Rock Review into Agricultural Tenancies which Sir Keir had referenced specifically in his speech to the NFU Conference in 2023 and which he followed up with statements in various articles written for the press. At that conference he also gave a commitment to the tenanted sector of agriculture that the policy around the development of solar energy would not be taken forward at the expense of tenant farmers who needed to be sure of the security of the soil beneath their feet – I shall return to this later in my report.

Of course, the July election delivered a huge victory for Labour on the back of a crumbling Conservative vote impacted in many constituencies by the strong showing of both Reform (which secured a large percentage of the vote but not many seats) and the Liberal Democrats who saw a huge increase in its representation within Westminster. Of course, we fully expected the Government to hit the ground running when it came into office in July, particularly given the pent-up expectation that had been left unfulfilled through the pre-election period. However, what in fact happened was a further period of inactivity as we waited for the Chancellor of the Exchequer to announce her first Budget which would not be delivered for almost a full four months later. In our meetings with Ministers and civil servants there was a clear degree of impatience that important work streams could not be taken forward until the Treasury had pronounced.

However, just prior to the announcement of the General Election we did manage to see the completion of the agricultural landlord and tenant Code of Practice fulfilling an important recommendation contained within the Rock Review. In preparation for the drafting of that code, the TFA carried out a survey of its members which elicited one of the largest responses to any online survey carried out by the Association, with approximately one fifth the TFA members responding.

The results of the survey painted a very stark picture of relationships within the sector, with only around one third of respondents believing they had good relationships with their landlords. Very sadly, just over 30% of respondents went as far as to say that they felt bullied or harassed by their landlords and this percentage rose to 37% when asking about the relationship with landlords’ agents. This is a far cry from the collegiate, partnership approach that the TFA believes is necessary for the success of the sector and for individual businesses. Success is not bred from dispute but from building solid relationships. To that end, it was disappointing to hear that 70% of respondents rarely had meetings with their landlords at all and, when they did, it was usually because the landlord wanted something – an increase in rent or land back for non-agricultural use.

However, what was more alarming were the free text comments provided by respondents where they were recounting horrendous stories of poor relationships and often abusive behaviour. We provided a full, anonymised, readout of those comments to DEFRA as part of our response to the consultation on the creation of a Tenant Farming Commissioner, so that civil servants and Ministers had full exposure to the real issues that many tenant farmers face on an ongoing basis.

The TFA hailed the publication of the Code of Practice in April of last year as a huge step forward. Built around the concepts of clarity, communication and cooperation, it sets a really important blueprint for the development of positive landlord tenant relationships, not just in the context of using land for agricultural purposes, but for diversified activities and, crucially, for managing and building natural capital. It was greatly encouraging that the Code has been formally endorsed by all the leading farming and land owning organisations in addition to the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers and the Agricultural Law Association. It is essential that there is buy in not just from the principal players, but also from those who seek to advise both landlords and tenants as this advice will very often set the tone for the way in which relationships are managed.

With the Code in play, the TFA is encouraging its widespread use both through asking landlords to make reference to the Code within their individual tenancy agreements and seeking to embed the Code and its principles within template agreements produced by professional bodies and advisory organisations.

However, the real teeth of the Code of Practice will begin to be seen in the context of the appointment of a new Commissioner for the Tenant Farming Sector. Already a feature of the landlord tenant landscape in Scotland, the idea of a Commissioner for England will be to provide oversight to the conduct, practice and the management of disputes within the landlord tenant sector of agriculture south of the border. Providing a confidential service to look at both complaints and in assisting parties to manage disputes will be an essential part of the role. The TFA is also keen that the Commissioner has a role to play in reviewing the formal dispute resolution architecture used within agricultural tenancies, mainly arbitration, to determine whether it continues to provide an efficient, cost-effective and fit for purpose basis for formal determination of disputes between landlords and tenants.

Whilst announced by the previous administration, the TFA was pleased to hear the announcement made by Labour Minister, Daniel Zeichner, at the Northern Farming conference in October of last year that the appointment of the Commissioner was to be taken forward by the new Government. The DEFRA Secretary of State, Steve Reed announced the opening of the recruitment campaign for the role last month and we are anticipating the appointment being made later in the spring. The TFA looks forward to working with whoever is appointed to the role as a means to develop a much more positive and forward-looking sector for both existing tenant farmers and those who seek to join the sector.

Aside from the need to address some serious shortcomings in relationships between landlords and tenants, it has been encouraging to see how some of the major institutional landlords have been reimagining their relationships with their tenant farmers. The TFA has long sought to influence the policy and practice of these major landlords who, very often, act as a beacon for the rest of the landlord tenant system. For example, to see the National Trust put food production back into its 10-year strategy along with an impetus to develop stronger and more collegiate relationships with its tenant farmers is a huge leap forward for that organisation. The Church Commissioners which, in the past, has run its affairs much like a commercial pension fund is now taking a more considered approach to its landlord tenant relationships and taking more of a total return approach to its management, matching financial performance with social and environmental outcomes.

However, there has been a particularly significant shift seen in respect of The Crown Estate which I would like to highlight. Through the 2010’s the senior management of the Crown Estate undervalued its rural estate. In meetings between the TFA and the management of The Crown Estate its leadership disparagingly referred to its rural land as a “vanilla asset”. The determination of the Crown Estate was to pivot away from ownership of rural land and to rebalance its portfolio with more commercial and urban investment land. It also had a huge focus on exploiting its potential for developing offshore wind. Through this period, we saw large parts of the agricultural land of The Crown Estate sold off including the estates of Savernake, Dunster, Taunton, Boroughbridge, Bryanston and Gopsall. Well over 40,000 acres left The Crown Estate portfolio over the period. In some cases, estates were sold with sitting tenants and, in large part, remain within the landlord tenant system but in others, sitting tenants had the opportunity to buy some or all of the land they had farmed under their agricultural tenancies.

However, since the beginning of the decade, The Crown Estate has fallen back in love with its agricultural land, understanding both its ability to contribute financially to the public purse whilst at the same time delivering natural capital services including enhancing biodiversity, improving landscape and providing carbon services. The point of cementing this renewed commitment to its farmland was the merging of the management of the largely in hand Windsor Estate with the rest of The Crown Estate which is largely let out, with the aim of trying to replicate what practices have been taken forward at Windsor across the wider Crown Estate ownership.

At the beginning of last year, The Crown Estate invited the TFA to help it develop a new concept Farm Business Tenancy which it was calling an environmental Farm Business Tenancy (eFBT) which it wanted to roll out across the estate as a means to develop more collaborative arrangements with tenant farmers to deliver strong businesses which were also providing significant natural capital outcomes. Throughout 2024, the TFA liaised with The Crown Estate and its advisers, Burges Salmon in writing innovative clauses which would challenge the status quo, and which would demonstrate a step change in the manner in which landlords and tenants work together to deliver mutually agreed outcomes.

Having worked so hard on the production of the new style agreement the TFA was delighted when The Crown Estate asked if the TFA would be prepared to formally endorse the new agreement by allowing its logo to be used within it. To my knowledge I do not believe that the TFA has previously taken the step of endorsing a template agreement from any landlord.  Having referred the matter to the TFA’s Executive Committee, I believe it is a measure of how far we have come when I can report there was no objection to the TFA formally endorsing the new eFBT agreement. We are further delighted that The Crown Estate will be hosting us at Windsor in May for an important conference which will launch the eFBT to the wider landlord tenant sector. The Crown Estate has been clear that it wants to see the new agreement benefit both its own Estate and provide a better basis for landlord tenant relationships in other estates. We look forward to promoting the concept more widely with both institutional and private estates in the wake of the Windsor event.

When I became the National Chair of the TFA last year I paid tribute to my predecessor, Mark Coulman and I also noted that he would be continuing in his role as the TFA’s representative on the Farm Tenancy Forum to provide important continuity to that work. However, during the past year Mark indicated a need to step down from that role in order to be able to focus on domestic matters. I would therefore again like to pay tribute to Mark for the work that he has put into the Farm Tenancy Forum since it was created by DEFRA to take forward the recommendations of the Rock Review into agricultural tenancies. I have now been catapulted into representing the TFA on the forum and it has been good to hear just how much Mark’s contribution to the forum has been appreciated by the Chair and all the other representatives sat around that table. Mark gave me a hard act to follow as TFA National Chair and he has given me another difficult task to take forward his important legacy on the forum. I hope that I do both him and the TFA justice in that role. Certainly, the Farm Tenancy Forum continues to have a great deal of work to do, and I am therefore pleased that DEFRA Minister, Daniel Zeichner has reaffirmed his commitment to the forum including by agreeing to be present at every formal meeting it holds.

Of course, a huge cloud hangs over the industry and its tenanted sector from the announcements made by the Chancellor of the Exchequer as part of her budget in respect of changes to Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) from inheritance tax. Since the Budget the TFA has gone on record to say that it acknowledges and understands the huge challenges that exist within the public finances and therefore the need to raise revenue whilst at the same time finding mechanisms which prevent cash rich individuals from hiding their wealth from Inheritance Tax.  However, whilst the Chancellor of the Exchequer rightly said that she wanted to protect hard-working farm families, the changes that she has announced have unintended consequences for the tenanted sector of agriculture and other groups within the farming industry that the TFA is clear the Treasury needs to address.

In the context of targeting wealthy individuals who are buying agricultural land to avoid tax, the TFA has been clear that a better approach would have been to look at either abolition or significant restriction of Capital Gains Tax Business Assets Rollover Relief.   Indeed, having increased the rate of Capital Gains Tax and removed the ability for unused pension pots to be inherited free of tax, the TFA believes that the Government will have exacerbated the problem it was trying to address.  For those with new money acquired through capital gains made in the non-agricultural economy, there will continue to be a huge incentive to buy agricultural land given that the value of that land above the announced threshold will be charged half rate on Inheritance Tax in comparison to other assets. The changes announced will drive more new money into the agricultural sector as a tax efficient way to handle capital gains, whilst leaving a huge problem for old wealth within the system without access to the cash to pay tax on death.

In response to the October Budget, the TFA has seen the advisory industry step into gear by promoting the need for estates to look at restructuring their position to maximise their ability to avoid tax. With the landlord community being considerably risk averse, we are anticipating many situations where private landlords will be seeking to bring back into hand land currently let under short-term FBT agreements, to provide them with options for wealth management or to raise the funds necessary to pay any expected tax bill. We could see many FBT agreements being ended and many tenancy agreements that should have been offered being pulled from the market. We have had several conversations with TFA members who are worried about their position.

In addition, we know there will be circumstances where landlords had been considering investing in fixed equipment on holdings which they will now be rethinking due to the impact those investments will have on the value of their land holdings and their liability for future tax.  We have therefore expressed our regret that the Chancellor did not consider mechanisms to protect hard-working tenant farmers in the context of her Inheritance Tax changes. The TFA has long argued that the availability of APR to landlords should be restricted only to those letting on the longest terms. The TFA will therefore continue to pursue its idea that the estates should be able to add into the zero-rate band for Inheritance Tax, the value of any agricultural land let to tenant farmers on secure tenancy agreements let under the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 or those on FBT agreements let for 10 years or more without scheduled break clauses.

However, the TFA recognises that the issues for the sector go much more widely than just the impact on tenant farmers which is why we have been pursuing a range of other changes as follows:

• Increasing the combined APR/BPR zero rate band to at least double the proposed level.
• Allowing the combined APR/BPR zero rate band to be transferable between spouses and civil partners without them having to be joint holders of the agricultural and business assets prior to the relevant death.
• To amend the rules which see the residence nil rate band begin to diminish for estates beyond £2 million in value. Consideration should be given to increasing that to at least £5 million in line with the proposals above.
• To allow a shorter period – say one year – for potentially exempt transfers for individuals who are currently critically ill or will be 70 or over as at April 2026 and who pass land down to future generations at any time from now.

The Government is already planning to hold a technical consultation looking at the impact of the announced changes to the operation of estates which are in trust. The TFA believes it would be prudent to extend the terms of reference for that consultation to include other technical changes including those which I have set out above. However, to date, the Government is keeping the door to further change tightly shut and we will be continuing our lobbying on these issues right up until the conclusion of the passage of the Finance Act that will introduce these changes in the autumn.

I said I would return to the issue of solar energy which is another cloud that hangs over the tenanted sector of agriculture. Whilst owner occupiers are able to take the benefit of solar development if it is available, when the development is on tenanted land and approved by a local authority, at appeal or by the Secretary of State when it is large enough to be considered a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP), the tenant farmer will be evicted from their land, rarely with adequate compensation for their loss.  As I noted above, this is an issue which the Prime Minister referenced when Leader of the Opposition and when speaking to the annual conference of the NFU in February 2023. His exact words were as follows:

“Tenant farmers need a fair deal. They need to know their futures are secure. I want to see more solar farms across the countryside. We’ve got high hopes for solar energy in our green prosperity plan. There’ll be opportunities for farmers, opportunities for rural growth, cheaper bills, and in the long-term, real energy independence. But we can’t do it by taking advantage of tenant farmers, farmers producing good British food on carefully maintained, fertile land. They can’t plan properly if the soil beneath their feet isn’t secure. It’s a huge barrier to planning sustainable food production, so we’ve got to give them a fair deal, and we’ve got to use our land well”.

What the Prime Minister said sits squarely with the case law which provides that the impact of any development on the personal circumstances of occupiers who are not party to a planning application, must be taken into consideration as part of the planning process. However, sadly, this consideration does not always take place which is why we have pressed for the case law to be properly referenced within the National Planning Guidance.

In addition, the decisions of Ed Miliband as Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero to give consent to the 2,500 acre solar farm being developed by Sunnica on the Cambridgeshire-Suffolk border and the 3,000 acre Cottan solar farm in Lincolnshire have sent shockwaves through the local communities impacted and further afield.  The Secretary of State has been quoted as saying that solar power would provide “an abundant source of cleaner, cheaper energy on the mission towards 2030” and that he saw the need to make “tough decisions with ambition and urgency” as part of the plan to make “the UK a clean energy superpower”.  However, the concerns and feelings of local communities continue to be relevant to considering what projects should be approved. In the Sunnica case, the Planning Inspectorate clearly thought that the developer had not sufficiently made its case within the planning framework which must be the basis upon which we make these important decisions.

The TFA is seeing an increasing number of proposals coming forward for solar farms many of which are impacting tenanted farmland. Some of these are small-scale and will be considered locally, whilst others will be considered as NSIPs and will end up on the desk of the Secretary of State for decision. We are pressing that the Secretary of State reflects on the words of the Prime Minister spoken when Leader of the Opposition.  The drive towards net zero cannot be the only consideration when deliberating over solar farms. Food security, local community impact, landscape impact, heritage impact and the impact on tenant farmers all have to be taken into consideration. We live on a small, densely populated island with many competing demands for land and, in all things, balance is necessary.

These issues will be important considerations as we develop our response to the consultation on the Land Use Framework.  We have waited a very long time for the ideas around the Land Use Framework to emerge from the Government. On first view the consultation leaves us with deep concerns. The Government has identified the first objective for the framework as making space for nature. It has proposed achieving that objective through four categories of land use change, starting with influencing land management decisions at stage 1, right up to stage 4 where land is dedicated only to the production of climate and environmental benefits without any other outputs. However, the worrying aspect is that it is anticipated that all the change at stage 4 will be borne by the agricultural sector with no change anticipated from the urban or non-agricultural sectors.

It is projected that the area of agricultural land will fall from its current level of 70% of the land area of the country down to 60% by 2050. The TFA view is that it is unacceptable that UK agriculture will be forced to give up over 14% of its land area for dedicated climate and environmental outputs when the other sectors are providing little or nothing. The TFA has stated that a better approach would be to focus on how to take a land sharing approach, so that land can remain in agricultural production but be managed in ways that maximises benefits for climate and nature. There is so much good work going on in many aspects of the industry which we need to be prioritising, before we take corner solutions which see land taken out of production into potential vanity projects which will deliver little for society.

Additionally, we need DEFRA to speed up the work required to ensure that tenant farmers are not left out of the opportunities that may arise to contribute to these land sharing aspirations, by making sure that both the definition of agriculture and the rules are good husbandry (which still apply to agricultural tenancies today despite being written in 1947)  are brought up to date. These are issues that we will seek to promote through the Farm Tenancy Forum including by taking forward the Rock Review recommendation that the Law Commission be appointed to carry out that legislative review.

Of course, the work of the TFA spans both England and Wales. To date, the Welsh Government has not decided to take forward the idea of a landlord and tenant Code of Practice or the appointment of a Tenant Farming Commissioner but these are matters that TFA Cymru continues to pursue with Welsh Government. However, good progress has been made on the development of the new Sustainable Farming Scheme (SFS) to be introduced in January 2026 to replace the pre-existing schemes developed under the auspices of the EU Common Agricultural Policy.

At the beginning of 2024, the Welsh Government outlined a scheme design for the SFS which would have been a disaster for the tenanted sector of agriculture in Wales if it had been implemented. Following lobbying by TFA Cymru, whilst the previous Cabinet Secretary, Lesley Griffiths, had already accepted that tenant farmers should not be required to comply with the proposed 10% tree cover rule, there was still a large number of scheme requirements with which tenant farmers would not have been able to comply.  The new Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs and Deputy First Minister, Huw Irranca-Davies, has listened to our concerns and has proposed a new scheme outline which overcomes our objections.

TFA Cymru wants to ensure that the new scheme works for tenant farmers and we therefore welcomed the root and branch review launched by Mr Irranca-Davies through the establishment of a Ministerial Roundtable, an officials’ group and a carbon sequestration panel all involving TFA Cymru.

As a result of this process, a more pragmatic scheme outline was announced in November of last year. In addition, the Welsh Government also confirmed that where any scheme requirements are incompatible with the contractual or statutory obligations of a tenant farmer, the SFS will not require an action which the tenant cannot legally undertake. That is a win for tenant farmers in Wales delivered by TFA Cymru and I pay tribute to our TFA Cymru Chair, Dennis Matheson, Vice Chair, Elwyn Evans and our Chief Executive, George Dunn who all worked together to achieve this.

In addition, it was good to hear the Cabinet Secretary state that where the consent of a landlord might be needed by a tenant before participating in the SFS, it would be unreasonable for a landlord to deny the tenant access to the SFS. That will be helpful in any action a tenant might need to take in formally objecting to their landlord’s unreasonable refusal to consent to their participation using the new legislation enacted following further lobbying by TFA Cymru and to which I referred in my report to the AGM last year.

There is a long way to go, and we await the full impact assessment, economic case, the schedule of payments and the full scheme rules. However, given the commitment displayed by the Cabinet Secretary to date, we remain confident that we will eventually land in a good place in time for the implementation of the scheme in January 2026. This is a long way further forward than we thought we would be at the end of the original consultation in the spring of last year.

Whilst focusing on matters relating to Wales, I did highlight my delight last year in the news that our Welsh Chair, Dennis Matheson, had been awarded the MBE in his Majesty the King’s New Year Honours list in 2024 and it was good to see Dennis being invested with that honour by his Majesty the King at Buckingham Palace in December flanked by our Chief Executive, George Dunn and Membership and Administration Manager, Sharon Dunn who Dennis took along on the day.

The TFA also has continued to engage in a wider sphere on behalf of its members including regular engagement with DEFRA and the RPA on the implementation of new schemes and the agricultural transition plan. There have also been ongoing discussions with Natural England, Natural Resources Wales, the Environment Agency and the Animal and Plant Health Agency.  I referred last year to the backlash from the farming industry against the development of a Greener Farm Commitment module to Red Tractor.  This led to a wider consideration of the role of Red Tractor and other assurance schemes leading to a specific governance review for Red Tractor and a wider review of farm assurance undertaken by a set of Commissioners appointed by the NFU and AHDB. Those reviews have now produced their reports, and they do point to the need to have fundamental change in the way in which assurance schemes are administered and the TFA will be watching closely to ensure that those recommendations are taken forward.

Internally we have had to navigate through the unexpected changes thrust upon us in respect of our legal expenses’ insurance offered to TFA members with the withdrawal from the market from our previous provider, the Legal Protection Group. We are now fully up and running with a new scheme through Lycetts which, although priced more highly, provides a similar (and in some respects better) policy than the previous offering to TFA members.

The Executive Committee also decided it would be an opportune time for the Association to carry out an external review of its activities.  This reported to the Executive Committee towards the end of last year. Whilst that review was extremely complimentary about the work of the TFA and the high regard with which it is held, it did highlight the need for the TFA to address the fact that its membership covers a small part of the sector, an issue that I certainly am committed to taking forward as I continue in my role as TFA National Chair. Even through the paragraphs of this short report it is easy to see the benefit the TFA is providing to the tenanted sector of agriculture and there is no reason why any tenant farmer in England and Wales should not consider the TFA as their natural home, both to represent their interests and the sector within which they operate.

The Tenant Farmers Association does good every day for its members and the wider sector and we will continue to advocate both for the needs and aspirations of individual members and for the sector as a whole. It is not always the case that policymakers and those with wider responsibility for our sector fully appreciate the intricacies of the land occupation structures that overlay productive agriculture in the UK. Our job in the TFA is to ensure that the needs and aspirations of the let sector of agriculture, including all those who do not own the land they farm, are always front and centre in the minds of policymakers and others.

I’m truly grateful for the small staff team employed by the TFA which works tirelessly on behalf of our members. The dedication and professionalism of the staff was a key feature within the external review referred to above. I thank each member of the staff team for their input over the past year and I look forward to working with them further in the next two years in my role as National Chair. To that end I was pleased to see that the work of our Chief Executive, George Dunn, was acknowledged by Harper Adams University who has made him an Honorary Doctor of Laws.

I pay tribute too to all those organisations with whom we work to deliver services to our members and support the work that we do. I’m particularly grateful for our recommended chartered surveyors, solicitors and accountants who work with our staff team and represent many TFA members in negotiations and disputes. We have many sponsors and partners who provide important resource for the TFA to carry out its work, and I am particularly grateful to the Cibus Foundation which provided specific funding to assist the TFA with its staff development.

I reserve my final remarks for our loyal membership. Over 80% of the income we have as an organisation comes from the subscriptions paid by our members. It is no exaggeration to say that without our members there would be no TFA, and I am therefore truly grateful for their commitment to the work that we do.  I would encourage those who have not yet made the decision to join us to do so without delay. The TFA has proved itself to be a very effective organisation. Imagine how effective it could be with double the number of members.

-Ends-

MR25/06

05 March 2025

Notes to Editor:

To watch the Keir Starmer Speech at 2023 NFU Conference – “Tenant Farmers Need a Fair Deal”, click here.

For media enquiries, contact Julia Meadows, TFA Communications and Events Coordinator, on 0118 930 6130 or 07887 777157.